Current:Home > StocksArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -WorldMoney
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-16 18:30:23
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (91)
Related
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Tennis' powerbrokers have big plans. Their ideas might not be good for the sport.
- Grand jury indicts man for murder in shooting death of Texas girl during ATM robbery
- Grand jury indicts man for murder in shooting death of Texas girl during ATM robbery
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Arizona Democrats poised to continue effort to repeal 1864 abortion ban
- Pro-Palestinian student protests target colleges’ financial ties with Israel
- ‘Pathetic, Really, and Dangerous’: Al Gore Reflects on Fraudulent Fossil Fuel Claims, Climate Voters and Clean Energy
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Earth Day 2024: Some scientists are calling for urgent optimism for change | The Excerpt
Ranking
- Average rate on 30
- Mega Millions winning numbers for April 23 drawing: Did anyone win $202 million jackpot?
- Earth Day 2024: Some scientists are calling for urgent optimism for change | The Excerpt
- How airline drip pricing can disguise the true cost of flying
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Tyler, the Creator, The Killers to headline Outside Lands 2024: Tickets, dates, more
- Inside Kelly Clarkson's Most Transformative Year Yet
- Columbia says encampments will scale down; students claim 'important victory': Live updates
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Supreme Court to weigh Trump immunity claim over 2020 election prosecution. Here are the details.
Ex-officer wanted for 2 murders found dead in standoff, child found safe after Amber Alert
How US changes to ‘noncompete’ agreements and overtime pay could affect workers
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
Summer Kitchen Must-Haves Starting at $8, Plus Kitchen Tools, Gadgets, and More
WNBA star Brittney Griner, wife Cherelle announce they are expecting their first child
Man charged after shooting at person on North Carolina university campus, police say