Current:Home > MyLawyers who successfully argued Musk pay package was illegal seek $5.6 billion in Tesla stock -WorldMoney
Lawyers who successfully argued Musk pay package was illegal seek $5.6 billion in Tesla stock
View
Date:2025-04-17 18:04:05
DOVER, Del. (AP) — The lawyers who successfully argued that a massive pay package for Tesla CEO Elon Musk was illegal and should be voided have asked the presiding judge to award them company stock worth $5.6 billion as legal fees.
The attorneys, who represented Tesla shareholders in the case decided in January, made the request of the Delaware judge in court papers filed Friday.
The amount would apparently be far and away the largest such award, if approved. Lawyers in class-action suits stemming from the collapse of Enron got a record $688 million in legal fees in 2008.
“We are ‘prepared to eat our cooking,’” the Tesla plaintiff attorneys wrote in the court filing, arguing the sum is justified because they worked purely on a contingency basis for more than 5 years. If they lost they would have gotten nothing. The benefit to Tesla “was massive,” they said.
The requested award represents 11% of the Tesla stock — worth some $55 billion — that Musk was seeking in the compensation package, which Judge Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick ruled illegal in January.
Not only does the request take nothing from the electric car company’s balance sheet, it is also tax deductible, the attorneys argued. They are also seeking $1.1 million in expenses.
In her ruling, Judge McCormick accepted the shareholder lawyers’ argument that Musk personally dictated the landmark 2018 pay package in sham negotiations with directors who were not independent.
It would have nearly doubled Musk’s stake in Tesla. He currently holds 13%.
veryGood! (88)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Maryland’s Largest County Just Banned Gas Appliances in Most New Buildings—But Not Without Some Concessions
- Texas Oilfield Waste Company Contributed $53,750 to Regulators Overseeing a Controversial Permit Application
- The Best Portable Grill Deals from Amazon Prime Day 2023: Coleman, Cuisinart, and Ninja Starting at $20
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Las Vegas Is Counting on Public Lands to Power its Growth. Is it a Good Idea?
- Delivery drivers want protection against heat. But it's an uphill battle
- Three Midwestern States to Watch as They Navigate Equitable Rollout for EV Charging
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Denied abortion for a doomed pregnancy, she tells Texas court: 'There was no mercy'
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Amazon Prime Day 2023 Samsonite Deals: Save Up to 62% On Luggage Just in Time for Summer Travel
- Amazon Prime Day Rare Deal: Get a Massage Therapy Gun With 14,000+ 5-Star Reviews for Just $32
- Biden Administration’s Global Plastics Plan Dubbed ‘Low Ambition’ and ‘Underwhelming’
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Denied abortion for a doomed pregnancy, she tells Texas court: 'There was no mercy'
- NPR veteran Edith Chapin tapped to lead newsroom
- An experimental Alzheimer's drug outperforms one just approved by the FDA
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
2022 Will Be Remembered as the Year the U.S. Became the World’s Largest Exporter of Liquified Natural Gas
Trucks, transfers and trolls
The Real Reason Taylor Lautner Let Fans Mispronounce His Name for Decades
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Affirmative action for rich kids: It's more than just legacy admissions
Biden Administration Allows Controversial Arctic Oil Project to Proceed
Amazon Prime Day 2023: Get a Portable Garment Steamer With 65,000+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews for Just $28