Current:Home > ContactWisconsin Supreme Court sides with tenant advocates in limiting eviction records -WorldMoney
Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with tenant advocates in limiting eviction records
View
Date:2025-04-14 10:32:38
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court voted Monday in its first public administrative conference in more than a decade to reduce from 20 years to two years the time when most eviction records must be kept on the state court website.
The change was sought by tenant rights advocates who argued that the longer record-keeping has made it more difficult for people with lower incomes to find housing.
The court voted 4-3, with liberals in support and conservatives against, for shortening the record-keeping on the state court website, commonly referred to by the acronym CCAP.
Legal Action of Wisconsin sought the change for cases where there is no money judgment against a tenant. At a hearing last month, tenant advocates said the change would help renters with eviction histories, since many landlords rely solely on the statewide court website for determining whether to rent to someone.
Justice Brian Hagedorn dissented. He questioned closing off public access to the records, which he also said would pose an administrative burden for court officials. He said there were other ways to address concerns raised by tenant advocates.
“It just feels odd to me this court would get into it this way by shutting down access to records,” Hagedorn said Monday. “That’s a significant thing.”
Numerous landlord groups, including the Wisconsin Realtors Association, opposed the proposal. They argued that changing the rule could result in landlords charging higher rental deposits tAo protect themselves, a change that will negatively affect all renters.
Last year in Wisconsin, there were 25,819 filings for eviction with 1,621 resulting in judgment of evictions being granted, according to Wisconsin’s Department of Administration.
Justices voted to make the change in an open conference, something they haven’t held since 2012. The court’s new liberal majority changed operating procedures to again open the meetings that conservative justices closed in 2012 when they were in the majority.
The conference came just three days after the court voted 4-3, again along partisan lines, to accept a case seeking to overturn Republican-drawn legislative maps. Newly elected liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz decided against recusing in that case, despite threats from Republican lawmakers to impeach her if she hears it.
Protasiewicz participated in Monday’s administrative conference.
veryGood! (3774)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- From searing heat's climbing death toll to storms' raging floodwaters, extreme summer weather not letting up
- Los Angeles investigating after trees used for shade by SAG-AFTRA strikers were trimmed by NBCUniversal
- Need a consultant? This book argues hiring one might actually damage your institution
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- It's not just Adderall: The number of drugs in short supply rose by 30% last year
- New Report Expects Global Emissions of Carbon Dioxide to Rebound to Pre-Pandemic High This Year
- Disney World board picked by DeSantis says predecessors stripped them of power
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Biden’s Infrastructure Bill Includes Money for Recycling, But the Debate Over Plastics Rages On
Ranking
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- As Lake Powell Hits Landmark Low, Arizona Looks to a $1 Billion Investment and Mexican Seawater to Slake its Thirst
- Can Biden’s Plan to Boost Offshore Wind Spread West?
- Biggest “Direct Air Capture” Plant Starts Pulling in Carbon, But Involves a Fraction of the Gas in the Atmosphere
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Wife of Gilgo Beach murders suspect Rex Heuermann files for divorce as woman shares eerie encounter with him
- What happens to the body in extreme heat? Experts explain the heat wave's dangerous impact.
- EPA Struggles to Track Methane Emissions From Landfills. Here’s Why It Matters
Recommendation
Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
After Fukushima, a Fundamental Renewable Energy Shift in Japan Never Happened. Could Global Climate Concerns Bring it Today?
Fossil Fuel Companies Stand to Make Billions From Tax Break in Democrats’ Build Back Better Bill
Global Methane Pledge Offers Hope on Climate in Lead Up to Glasgow
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Get a Next-Level Clean and Save 58% On This Water Flosser With 4,200+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews
Barack Obama drops summer playlist including Ice Spice, Luke Combs, Tina Turner and Peso Pluma
A Just Transition? On Brooklyn’s Waterfront, Oil Companies and Community Activists Join Together to Create an Offshore Wind Project—and Jobs